Ratings Selection New technologies Reviews

Philips HR 1871 juicer review

Juicer Philips HR 1871 - advantages, disadvantages, characteristics

Philips HR 1871 juicer review

Specifications

Specifications
Type of centrifugal
Power 800 W
Juice tank cup, volume 1.50 l
Direct juice system there is
Drop-stop system there is
Collection of pulp automatic pulp ejection, tank volume 1.60 l
Protective functions protection against accidental activation
Features
Body material stainless steel
Centrifuge mesh material stainless steel
Round neck there is
The size of the neck 80 mm
Equipment n n brush for cleaning
Rubber feet there is
Cord Compartment there is a length of 1 m
Control
Number of speeds 2
Dimensions and weight
Weight 4.9 kg

Reviews of juicer Philips HR 1871

Virtues

  • Power. Quick assembly and disassembly. Well washed. Great spin. Spin speed

disadvantages

  • Unnoticed so far ... Yes, there seems to be no Alone +

Comment
Bought a couple of months ago, mainly for processing apples into wine. On the first day I tried oranges. With 1.2 kg, the juice yield was about 600 grams. What struck. so is the speed. No sooner had you “clicked” in one place, the juice was ready. Today I tried to squeeze apple juice on a vino. Could not even imagine in a dream. that the 18 liter bottle of juice will take only half an hour. and then with a break of 30 minutes for the “rest” of the juicer. Juice pressed at first speed, just enough for one "batch" and the number of oil cake in the sump, and the amount of juice in the glass. Stopped dismantled. took out the cake, and poured the juice into the bottle. On the one hand, it can be considered a disadvantage. each time to disassemble the juicer and remove the cake. With a portable glass for cake and easier and easier, but for the processing of a large number of raw materials, such a disassembly is a big plus. At this time, the juicer is resting, cooling ... ..After processing a half sack of apples. the mesh accordingly acquired a yellowish-reddish color from the iron found in apples. Since the kit does not come with a brush for washing the mesh, I used a regular old toothbrush and toothpaste. Washed off with a bang. Usually I wash the mesh under a good pressure of the shower jet. There is a slight shift during power up. but what do you want if you take several thousand turns from the spot. During the work worth. Nowhere does not run. No noise. (By the way, the son slept in the next room and did not hear my processing). They write that there is no drop-stop function. And God bless her, put something under the spout. In general, the juicer is satisfied. Worth the money, and I think there is no overpayment for the Brand ...... Friend joked. they say try to load birch balance in the spring into the juicer, we will squeeze the birch sap, , I wouldn’t be surprised if the juice really gets out of the birch chocks. Relics and dope enough for the eyes. So do not hesitate guys. There is an opportunity to take
nik-mu, 2012-09-02 Evaluation 5


 

Comment
Good juicer. Before that, I used the HR-1858 model, there were no questions about the work, except for washing after use, so this problem sometimes stopped when there was a desire to drink fresh juice. The model HR-1871 does not have this problem, it is quick and convenient to wash it. The quality of spinning is also quite satisfactory. There were doubts when choosing engine power, 800 or 1000 W - take 800 W, quite enough, the power of the unit is felt. Well, its modern and interesting design, it will look good in any kitchen. At first its dimensions worried a little, but then it turned out that it was quite compact. Well, the build quality with 2 years warranty also adds its advantages. Here they have already written about persistently lobbying the Bork brand in large chain hypermarkets of household appliances. I also ran into this as soon as I asked to show the juicer — I immediately began to aggressively offer Bork.I have nothing against this brand, but my principle is why overpay a few thousand for a diamond-coated mesh, sky-high engine speeds and the presence of a large number of stainless steel outside. Therefore, if you want to buy a good juicer, take this model; the price corresponds to the quality of the product.
Volynets Sergey, 2013-06-01 Evaluation 4


 

Virtues

  • Spin quality, design, usability

disadvantages

  • Not yet identified

Comment
She is great!!!!
Looks like a spaceship! Squeezes the fruit in 2 seconds! Juice thick, rich! The cake is absolutely dry. like sawdust for a hamster.
Use insanely nice! Convenient connector for placing fruit, a large glass at once with a lid for collecting foam.
The juicer is so heavy, so it stands firmly on the table, does not move anywhere.
Washing it is a pleasure !!! All parts can be simply rinsed under a stream of water (fruit is not greasy), and a strainer enough to rub with the back of the sponge and everything moves away. The main thing is to do it IMMEDIATELY after use. because if the pieces of fruit dry up, then it will be impossible to scrub them, it seems to me.
Now on the juice output: 2 apples and 3 carrots - a glass of juice (230 ml) and a half cup of dry oilcake.
I am delighted!
I chose this device thanks to the reviews on this site. And I want to say THANK YOU to everyone for their help in choosing! I hope my review will also help someone.
garbovskaya-dm, 2013-03-14 Evaluation 5


 

Virtues

  • Vesch!

disadvantages

  • Well maybe the size

Comment
I bought 10/26/13, model 1871 / 10.made in china, instead of 800 watts it turned out to be 1000 watts. Glad.
Cool stuff! Makes exactly JUICE. No mash, no oshmetok. As for the cake - as a new clay. Those. maybe wet, but squeeze out something else will not succeed, because everything is already squeezed before us.
At work: The hole for shoving is wide, for 40 minutes he dies 2.5 buckets of apples, he hardly cuts - they get in, cleaned three times, and then stopped. The squeezer was not indignant, did not try to stop itself. And nifiga while not heated. The yield of juice to the cake about 60 to 40, probably depends on the variety. Wash quickly, no brushes for the grid is not necessary - a sponge washes fine! Understood-going to one-two-three, done well, nothing creaks, does not crack, does not fall off. The Chinese have pleased!
He drove straight into the pan, foam (resembles a mousse) immediately removed with a spatula-with-holes, as a result - juice, as in Soviet times, in 3-liter jars, such as a little pulp at the bottom. The size, of course, is still the same, but I have where to put it.
Conclusion: for a glass of juice for every day, Mona should take both smaller and simpler, but to catch up a liter and a half at a time is the very thing. And for a bag of apples perfect. I do not regret at all that I bought.
P.S. Here's another thing: the drop-stop on the metal nose was automatic. It is difficult to explain, but it works!
Grig Serg, 2013-10-28 Evaluation 5


 

Virtues

  • powerful, fast, reliable, functional
  • Easy to disassemble and wash.
  • Does not vibrate on the table.
  • The volume is moderate.

disadvantages

  • tall and heavy

Comment
Satisfied with the acquisition completely. Squeezes juice from any vegetables and fruits in a second. If only she would also quickly assemble herself after bathing))) Oil cake, depending on the type of product - from slightly wet to more moist, but this is the best I've seen before (comparing Zhuravinka, Simbo, Moulinex). And what else is needed for this type of technology? The presence of fresh juice for a short time.
As a shortcoming, I indicated its large size in height, but this is tolerable, considering that I selected it according to the size of my cupboards in the kitchen and was ready for it.
Before this c / v I bought a small-sized Simbo juicer (I saved space in a small kitchen), she didn’t last 2 days, squeezed juice from all the cracks and flooded the engine. That's how you can easily goof without reading reviews. Lord Always read product reviews, both good and bad. Choose from where the largest number of reviews, while the bad ones (1-2 points) - less than 10% of the total number).
Lukayeva Zhanna, 2013-07-08 Evaluation 5


 

Virtues

  • It is very easy to wash - it doesn’t bother at all, the mesh is so small that it practically doesn’t get clogged up with me, with my usual dish brush. The ideal model for daily use in a small family. I press much longer than the declared 40 seconds - nothing overheats. But not for half an hour, of course.

disadvantages

  • Even with a spout against a drop after turning off the juice still accumulates and drips. But it seems that this is not related to the design. And this is a small thing!

Comment
Great model! For a long time I chose from reviews on the Internet and from friends. In the shops, the sellers advertise Bork, and it is this model that is just being poured over with mud due to an inverted grid. Do not listen to them! Compact, very simple, well pressed. I am delighted! My friends, having listened to me, bought the same the next day - and were also very pleased. The cake is not like dry sawdust, but not wet. For those who choose cheaper, I can add: my relative has changed many juicers, the main problem was that the top lids flew away from the blows of vegetables. So, he advised me to choose so that the cover was made from high-quality thick plastic. Those. people about broken covers write the truth. And in this model, the inverted mesh does not even imply such a problem, but the top is still of very thick plastic. And it's great that it is tinted, and most of the details are black - nothing is painted and the machine looks like new. I recommend to everyone! By the way, it makes no more noise than Bork - I was specifically included in the store, even though I didn’t ask - they wanted to sniff it. In general, the price-quality ratio is perfect.
Anonim 2012-03-12 Evaluation 5

 

Philips HR 1871 juicer video review

 


 

 

Author: Andrey Balyshev 24.06.2015
Attention! The accuracy of the information and the results of the ranking is subjective and is not an advertisement.

Ratings

Selection

New technologies