AMD FX-6300 Vishera (AM3 +, L3 8192Kb)

Advantages: Powerful! Deshovy! chasing a bang. Just a delight! It rustles like an electric broom at 5 GHz, heats up to 68 degrees under load and 36.6 without it. Seven estimates at 7.8. The word "Welcome" flashes like the 25th frame :)) (well, there is also the merit of the SSD and, naturally, memory and mothers, but nevertheless it pumps the heart to the full :))

Disadvantages: did not notice. Coffee by the way does not cook: (

Comment: I recommend of course. I use a video processor
. When encoding h264 fullHD one and a half hour movie (I work in adobe premiere pro), you can play Euro Track Simulyator 2. I overclocked to 5 GHz. stupidly raising the multiplier. Very pleased with the purchase.

Advantages: very inexpensive, very powerful - 4K 15-25% load (HD video card R7 260X OC), chases easily to 4.7 - a large percentage, with a slight increase in voltage. Hang up a couple of running virtual machines in the tray, start up the torrent rocking chair, and start playing - then compare with more expensive competitors and find out "Who is taking off!" ...

Disadvantages: energy consumption, after all, this processor has a server orientation ...

Comment: JUST GODZILLA !!!

Advantages: Cheapness. Multithreading. Power.

Disadvantages: You need to take an oem version and a good cooler.

Comment: I sat on the E-7200 pentuche, I wanted to buy a pentuch, but I bought expensive amd and wouldn’t be happy. And what they say is heated so much, so take a good cooler, it will still be cheaper than Intel. More than 37% could not load. Although a gamer. Electricity bills also did not grow, the maximum gave about 45 watts.

Advantages: Price

Disadvantages: Not found

Comment: I have this miracle of technology! In conjunction with gigabyte 990xa-ud3 + 32GbDDR3 + HD7950, the computer is designed to work in 3d packages such as 3ds max, maya, Zbrush, vue, Houdini, PhotoShop lightroom, in general, the primary task of rendering and processing graphics, as you started a theme that is better Intel or AMD and I posted a post where processors were tested in 3ds max where amd went around 2600k I was accused of bias and similar nonsense, which I believe and justify amd, since I have it. I offered to put rivals in the test, I took part about 50 different processors, according to the finals of the first test, the rival was i7 3930k and it went to a confident lead. The scene was selected and we put on a calculation in 3d max (v-ray) the results of all surprised i7 3930k render time 41 minutes, AMD FX8350 42:24 min 1.5 minute difference for $ 600 well, no, thanks I can money for i 3930k fx-8350 to buy along with the motherboard and bp, hdd. so what, what would you not poured into your ears, only you can find out which is better, oh by the way cooling, ninja 3 I have after overclocking to 4.7GHz temperature above 62 degrees does not rise with a load of 100% for several hours

Advantages: productive, gorgeous in multi-thread, fully gaming percent, cheap, cold (above 65gr not heated in linx), unlocked multiplier, not trimmed relative to 8350 top (only tdp higher, apparently less successful chip goes to 8320, and more successful to 8350 therefore, it is better for lovers to overclock to take the top).produced at a factory in dresden. : D

Disadvantages: Eats a lot of energy (32nm process technology), in one-stream it is drained by intel. few games that reveal the potential of such a number of cores (except far cry3, crysis3 ...). Beta battelfield4 by the way is also well-suited for multi-core, so Vanguy good profit fx-s in this game.

Comment: I took the PC in 2011 on phenome2. in 2013 I thought: "and not whether to upgrade"? a friend needed an inexpensive gaming comp, I sold him with a hairdryer for a nominal sum and took FX-8320. what to say? Percent smart, very, said that in a multithread everything was better. You can play, climb in the browser, run a couple more progs and nothing slows down. I had little business with Intels, but their architecture is more for single-threaded applications sharpened, so they are fast in tests, but when you load a bunch of applications, they can be “dulled”. and this is no tester, no manager will tell you. because the tester is testing one application (sometimes killing graphics so that it is not a game mode), and the manager is better to sell the computer more expensive, and this is Intel. In general, the percentage is excellent, I ask AMD not to throw AM3 + and generally high-performance large x86 cores. Please release the stimulator.

Advantages: Price
Performance
Heat dissipation
I do not pay attention to power consumption
8 logical cores
In combination with SSD booting of Windows 8 OS (6 sec), I have a BIOS on the system board, it takes longer to load its modules.
I forgot what a response delay is (interface braking)
Generally forgot about lags!

Disadvantages: not

Comment: MYTH, that this line is heated like a stove on the stove is a complete nonsense!
With my crooked tower cooler (the curve due to the fact that three slots for RAM overlap, we had to cram it with the other side, which was disturbed by the organized air flow in the case). For a given defect of the cooler, he cursed for a very long time, he thought about changing, but it wasn’t necessary due to the results.
In idle 29C.
In the synthetic test load:
-OSST, the test was carried out for an hour, the temperature was 56C in continuous load, as recommended, the most hellish stability test.
-Here, the 7ZIP test issued 53C (also for an hour).
AIDA 64 stability test is generally 51C (with the same testing time interval).
In normal mode, it was possible to load for needs only by 40%, considering that the motherboard itself, depending on the load, cuts and accelerates the processor from 1.4 GHz to 4.1 GHz (NOT TURBO MODE! Average between economy and turbo) .
Pulls everything absolutely perfect, no complaints whatsoever.
When buying a processor from this line, I was most afraid of overheating (since the comments wrote that something about 50C was idle), everything turned out to be fiction, it was very pleased with the purchase, with a margin of 5 years is enough, since there is an opportunity to overclock to 4.7 GHz.

Advantages: Performance at altitude. In conjunction with a RAM of at least 16Gb, a sufficiently powerful video card while simultaneously rendering, working with photoshop, the torrent is turned on, there are no open tabs on the system’s brake browsers. The temperature in the presence of a 90-120mm cooler, a spacious case and proper organization of air flow by the Speed ​​Fan program is determined at a mere 36 degrees, under load 47. Given the price / performance + quality, this product is a worthy alternative to Intel counterparts.

Disadvantages: Increased power consumption.

Comment: About 10-15 percent increase in performance mainly in single-stream applications of crystals from Intel is not an advantage, given the performance of the same tasks, reliability, as well as the significantly lower price of the processor from AMD FX 8350.

Advantages: Fast
Inexpensive
Easy chases

Disadvantages: Heat
Stock cooler - who came up with it?

Comment: Config:
ASUS Sabertooth 990FX R2.0
AMD FX-8350
2x4Gb Kingston HyperX 1866Mhz
SSD Corsair Force FT 60Gb
MSI GTX560Ti-HAWK
BP Cooler Master GX750
Cooler Zalman 10X Performa

Quite pleased with the purchase. It used to be Fen II x4 975 + ASUS M4A87TD. The system works fine (Win8Pro). I didn’t notice much difference in games, but in BF3 it became much more comfortable to play 64 bodies, the FPS didn’t sink below 60, as it was on Fen (it happened to 24, it sagged).
All those who left reviews with 1 star - either trololo or pens from the wrong place grow.
I hope the review will be useful.

Advantages: Performance
Multitasking
Overclocking potential

Disadvantages: Rated thermal power (125 W)
The need to update the entire software

Comment: Acquired the FX-8350 in the BOX picking at the end of December 2012. The task was to assemble a system in which there would be a balance of performance, noise and at an affordable price. The PC was built with almost 0, so the MP was purchased: ASUS M5A99X EVO, RAM: M378B1G73BH0-CH9 (x2), CO: SCBSK-2100 - because the standard cooling system did not make a positive impression on me, thermal paste - AlSil 3 ... What do you want to say in conclusion, the FX-8350 made a positive impression on me, for all the time I used it I had no problems with it, what people wrote here that it was almost about 60 degrees alone, to say the least, was surprised by my values ​​alone range from 31 to 35; CPU speed FAN = 1000 rpm. Yes, in some games it is inferior to I5, but not to 50%, for comparison, the friend I5 difference varies by several FPS, moreover, his video card is 2 times more powerful than mine, and after switching to win_8 and updating all the drivers, it almost disappeared. Thank you all for your attention.

Advantages: price
performance

Disadvantages: no

Comment: He took to handle video and 3D graphics, copes with his tasks. An example of one test in 3ds max, a render of a test scene.
Intel Core i7-2700K - 39 minutes
AMD 8350 - 36.7 minutes
And do not forget that the 8350 is much cheaper than the i7. IMHO, for multi-threaded problems the optimal solution.