Bosch MFQ 36460
detailed information
9.4 / 10
Rating
Bosch MFQ 36460 Specifications
General characteristics | |
---|---|
Type of | stationary |
Bowl | plastic |
Power | 450 watts |
Number of speeds | 5 |
Additional Modes | turbo |
Number of nozzles | 2 |
Nozzles | whisk, dough hooks |
Body material | plastic |
Features | |
Tool storage | not |
Nozzle release button | there is |
Protective cover on the bowl | not |
Reviews of Bosch MFQ 36460
Evaluation
2
Advantages: Stationary mixer
Disadvantages: The speed, even 5, is sooooo small.
When working, together with the bowl, noisy.
When working, together with the bowl, noisy.
Comment: Comments: "little noisy", "it works quietly, it does not wake children" ... I don’t argue, it works quietly without a station, like all normal mixers, but you probably didn’t take a stationary mixer not to use a separate mixer, but what would use exactly the station! At 1,2,3 speeds it’s not noisy, but at 5 it’s something! The manual says: "... at 1 speed, put the ingredients in the batch and do the mixing at 5 speeds ...", "... main batch at 5 speeds ...", i.e. The main working speed is 5! But it is not really magnificent to whip the cream together !!! The old Tefal mixer beat a fluffy mass at 2 speeds, out of 5, in 5 minutes, this one in 25 minutes barely lifted !!! If you need to make dough, then this mixer with a bowl is very convenient and the power is good. But, if you need to do something magnificent, alas, it will not work!
Pavlov Alexander
January 19, 2016,
Moscow
\ Experience: several months
Evaluation
3
Comment: Weak momentum. I decided to make a beleva pastille (it was for this purpose that I asked for this mixer as a gift), mashed a lot, divided it into 2 parts - one with a mixer, the second with an old Moulinex Odazio combine (previously believed that the function of beating it is not very good). As a result, the munex has long been beating the fluffy mass with peaks, and the boshik puffs everything ... after 30 minutes of beating, it was not possible to get the desired consistency, I had to be entrusted to finish this work with the mullinex. I haven't tried to whip anything else yet, I hope there will be no problems with other dishes.
Grishina Irina
August 10, 2015,
Moscow
\ Experience: less than a month
Evaluation
4
Advantages: It works quietly, does not spray at low speed and does not dust with flour.
Disadvantages: Rather, the personal feeling - low turns ...
Comment: I bake a lot, including to order .. And after the breakdown of the previous mixer urgently needed a replacement. There was a Tefal mixer with a thicket of 350 W ... I chose this Bosch, it is more powerful. Although in general, everything is the same as the previous one. I ordered it in the online store, after reading all the reviews about this model.
When they brought home and I turned it on, the first thing I had was a shock ... It seemed to me that despite the stated power, the mixer was rather weak. I compared it with my old one. I was afraid that he would not beat the cream in my head as needed at such speeds. But today I checked it on the most “choosy” cream for the cake and was surprised - he managed !!!!!!
Most likely it seems to me because of the quiet operation of the mixer .. It works very quietly ... The last mixer roared like a puncher. And with this I can whip, even when the children are sleeping)))))
I liked that at the very first speed the mixer works slowly. And then I used to have a mixer, albeit at 1, but I still worked quickly and sprinkled flour around. So this Bosch does not do that, it really works slowly on the unit.
While I use it for a short time, I rate it as very good. And for quiet work - excellent at all !!!!
When they brought home and I turned it on, the first thing I had was a shock ... It seemed to me that despite the stated power, the mixer was rather weak. I compared it with my old one. I was afraid that he would not beat the cream in my head as needed at such speeds. But today I checked it on the most “choosy” cream for the cake and was surprised - he managed !!!!!!
Most likely it seems to me because of the quiet operation of the mixer .. It works very quietly ... The last mixer roared like a puncher. And with this I can whip, even when the children are sleeping)))))
I liked that at the very first speed the mixer works slowly. And then I used to have a mixer, albeit at 1, but I still worked quickly and sprinkled flour around. So this Bosch does not do that, it really works slowly on the unit.
While I use it for a short time, I rate it as very good. And for quiet work - excellent at all !!!!
Belozertseva Victoria
February 14, 2015,
Novosibirsk
\ Experience: less than a month
Evaluation
5
Advantages: Convenient, easy to clean, reasonable price.
Disadvantages: Not found
Comment: From the mixer delighted. Whips great! Not very noisy (in comparison with the former), I use it quite recently, but for now I am really satisfied! Cooked cakes, charlottes, everything is fine.Today I made dumplings dough and was pleasantly surprised! The dough is gorgeous and clean hands! I did not think that he would knead the tight dough, but he take it and make it! As I used to live without him))
Zaripova anna
October 25, 2014,
Yekaterinburg
\ Experience: less than a month
Evaluation
5
Advantages: Best in its price range, the base frees your hands
Disadvantages: From frequent use, the gears are erased from the base)
Comment: I bake a lot, the mixer works for wear. But! Already the sixth year! In inhuman conditions! And it still works))) The gears of two stationary bases have worn off, but the mixer is still the same, the second one has not been used)) To be honest, I did not expect such a life expectancy, but ...
Asmankina Marina
May 06, 2014,
Kaluga
\ Experience: over a year
Evaluation
5
Advantages: Dough revenge any. It works quietly.
Disadvantages: This is not a fault, but a wish: It is a pity that there is no second bowl. That is not enough to knead white and black bread immediately, set aside on the "rise" in bowls. It would be very convenient.
Comment: This is the reincarnation of the Bosch MFQ 3560. Well, so that the list of new products was higher. There are no differences. Pulse mode? what is it? In this model there is a “Turbo” - somehow I didn’t use it, I don’t know.
And it was like that, I rummaged through the entire Internet, I needed a mixer to beat a hard dough. There is already a blender with a whisk, copes with its tasks normally. It was looking for COOL dough - to bake bread at home. As it turned out, in the descriptions or reviews need a power of at least 400 watts (at the extreme 350). OK. And immediately you find yourself in a new frame - this is noise. Most powerful mixers are like a vacuum cleaner. Therefore, making the choice you have to climb and read the reviews.
In general, to check mine, read about the Bosch MFQ 3560. If you decide to trust, then I have already said - quiet. Even compared to a 300 watt blender - quiet.
The size of the bowl is always indicated 2 liters, but at the very top it includes exactly 3 liter cans (USSR) - I personally measured / checked it, my nose-per-thread. Most likely, it is correct to write 2,5 liters - for the house it is "above-roof".
Personally, I tossed between the bread maker and the mixer + oven. After watching a lot of videos and flipping through the recipe, I made a choice in favor of the latter and so far I have no regrets. Bread maker - kneads the dough, but still, it restricts greatly with recipes, and especially with shapes and sizes.
I advise this model and the 3560 - there is no difference. But if you need a very solid dough, then you should look for watts from 550, more professional and expensive. And so. for home, for bread - fine. The rest can even blender for 1000 rubles.
And it was like that, I rummaged through the entire Internet, I needed a mixer to beat a hard dough. There is already a blender with a whisk, copes with its tasks normally. It was looking for COOL dough - to bake bread at home. As it turned out, in the descriptions or reviews need a power of at least 400 watts (at the extreme 350). OK. And immediately you find yourself in a new frame - this is noise. Most powerful mixers are like a vacuum cleaner. Therefore, making the choice you have to climb and read the reviews.
In general, to check mine, read about the Bosch MFQ 3560. If you decide to trust, then I have already said - quiet. Even compared to a 300 watt blender - quiet.
The size of the bowl is always indicated 2 liters, but at the very top it includes exactly 3 liter cans (USSR) - I personally measured / checked it, my nose-per-thread. Most likely, it is correct to write 2,5 liters - for the house it is "above-roof".
Personally, I tossed between the bread maker and the mixer + oven. After watching a lot of videos and flipping through the recipe, I made a choice in favor of the latter and so far I have no regrets. Bread maker - kneads the dough, but still, it restricts greatly with recipes, and especially with shapes and sizes.
I advise this model and the 3560 - there is no difference. But if you need a very solid dough, then you should look for watts from 550, more professional and expensive. And so. for home, for bread - fine. The rest can even blender for 1000 rubles.
reS Serg
April 8, 2014,
St. Petersburg
\ Experience: several months
Evaluation
4
Advantages: the presence of the bowl and the removable mixer itself. bottom light suction cups, does not move when using
Disadvantages: the cord is short, but it is in all mixers
Comment: I am very pleased that I threw the products into the bowl and they themselves interfere there, no need to keep the mixer in their hands. well whites whites for biscuit and meringue. speed run too happy (1-5) is easy to find the right one. power in principle is sufficient and for the kneading is not very steep
With I
April 02, 2014,
Ufa
\ Experience: several months
Evaluation
5
Advantages: powerful, light, quiet, rotating bowl, the ability to remove the mixer from the stand
Disadvantages: not yet revealed
Comment: I recently acquired a Bosch MFQ 36460 mixer, as I understand it is an updated version of the model 3560. Therefore, I was guided by reviews on this model. She cooked pastries several times and used whips. Very satisfied, everything beats with a bang, is not heated and hands are free while the mixer works. Hard dough is not kneaded. I hope it will serve me for a long time. In a few months I will add a review. There is a hole for additional blender attachments (need to be purchased separately)
Kukhtina Julia
February 20, 2014,
Moscow
\ Experience: less than a month
Evaluation
4
Advantages: The rotation of the bowl. Low price.
Disadvantages: Burnout at low speeds. No bearings.
Comment: Properly worked over a year. It is strictly not recommended to knead the dough at the lowest speeds.He does not have time to cool himself.
Simonov Mikhail
January 29, 2014,
Moscow
\ Experience: over a year
Evaluation
5
Advantages: Quiet, lightweight (much lighter than a Philips HR 1617 blender), perfectly beats up a small amount of products, workmanship is up to par (made in Slovenia), not too big: in my small kitchen I settled in the microwave, next to the blender)))).
Disadvantages: Not the cheapest, but its advantages, in my opinion, override this disadvantage.
Comment: This is my first mixer of a similar plan. Very pleased with the purchase. Before that, she used only a blender mixer-whisk, which broke through her own fault, it was not so cheap to replace the part, decided to buy a mixer more substantial.
Citizens, this is heaven and earth! I threw food - and go about your business.
For a week's use, I cooked different dough: a lung on proteins, average pancake density, for a cake, for ravioli (out of 200 grams of flour). I dumped some water into the dumplings (it turned out rather dryly), kneaded the mixer with it (with a silicone spatula "helped" to shake the flour off the walls at the initial stage), the dough was dying for about 2 minutes (the mants turned out to be quite good, they "got it all").
By the way, there is a recommendation in the manual: do not prepare the dough from more than 500 grams of flour. I did not try to lay 500 grams, and generally I do not cook on an industrial scale).
Chose between Bosch MFQ 3555, Bosch MFQ 3560 and this model.
From all that I have read, I found out that the model 3555 has a power of 350 W compared to this mixer, the 3555 and 3560 have the same design, but slightly different power (350 and 450 W), but the characteristics of the 3560 are 36460. This mixer is simply a newer model. I understand that the quality of the performance of culinary masterpieces, judging by the many positive reviews about the model 3555, should not be reflected. As a result, I bought this one as the cheapest in my city.
I recommend to buy.
Citizens, this is heaven and earth! I threw food - and go about your business.
For a week's use, I cooked different dough: a lung on proteins, average pancake density, for a cake, for ravioli (out of 200 grams of flour). I dumped some water into the dumplings (it turned out rather dryly), kneaded the mixer with it (with a silicone spatula "helped" to shake the flour off the walls at the initial stage), the dough was dying for about 2 minutes (the mants turned out to be quite good, they "got it all").
By the way, there is a recommendation in the manual: do not prepare the dough from more than 500 grams of flour. I did not try to lay 500 grams, and generally I do not cook on an industrial scale).
Chose between Bosch MFQ 3555, Bosch MFQ 3560 and this model.
From all that I have read, I found out that the model 3555 has a power of 350 W compared to this mixer, the 3555 and 3560 have the same design, but slightly different power (350 and 450 W), but the characteristics of the 3560 are 36460. This mixer is simply a newer model. I understand that the quality of the performance of culinary masterpieces, judging by the many positive reviews about the model 3555, should not be reflected. As a result, I bought this one as the cheapest in my city.
I recommend to buy.
December 21, 2013,
Smolensk
\ Experience: less than a month
Bosch MFQ 36460 is selected to the rating:
Top 15 kitchen mixers