Canon EF 50mm f / 1.8 STM

Advantages: 1. High-aperture lens 1.8 is enough for my tasks.
2. Lightweight, which is very pleasing.
3. The price suits me perfectly
4. sharp and bokeh very pleasing to the eyes

Disadvantages: With an open diaphragm, it misses with focusing, photographing on 600D. There is also a lack of squishy material, so be careful with this lens.

Comment: I bought it for shooting portraits on the Planer, sometimes I use it for landscape photography, and it copes perfectly with my tasks. If you want to change the standard lens or buy high-aperture, then the Canon 50mm 1.8 will be the most.

Advantages: Price, good construction, fast, silent, fairly accurate.

Disadvantages: For this money there is no)

Comment: The lens is worth its money, fast silent focusing, sharp from F / 1.8, focuses well even under poor shooting conditions, I advise you to buy a hood so as not to damage the proboscis with active use, did not catch hares, the evaluation is solid 4. Here you can see examples of photos http : //onfotolife.com/? language = en

Advantages: Size, aperture, ideal for portraits

Disadvantages: The focus does not always fall, it is difficult to shoot indoors

Comment: I began to study photography on this lens! In a photo studio with professional light works perfectly. Outside is great too! On exposure longer 1/125 smears. In the dark, it behaves well if hands grow from where or have a tripod.

I was tormented by taking family holidays with him: I had to be hammered into a corner in order to take in the lens as many people as possible. For a newbie - perfect, but you need to supplement some wide.

Advantages: The cost of 7000 rubles
Light, shot at night in the park with lights in ISO 400, if your hands are not shaking, you can walk up to 200
Good Autofocus, Although there is a better
Compact

Disadvantages: The focus ring licked the horse, it is difficult to clean it, and the stain remains
There are chromatic aberrations on the contours of houses for example
Not the sharpest, although sharp lenses cost 50,000

Comment: The best budget portrait, constantly using it. for his money, he is just gorgeous, nice soft bokeh, good luminosity, good autofocus.

Advantages: 1. Decent sharpness on the open aperture, starting from about f2,5-2.8, the picture is already "ringing"
2. More aperture blades than in the old version (7 vs 5), which means more even bokeh without nuts
3. Metallic bayonet
4. High-quality assembly, nice matte plastic casing, low weight
5. Good work of the AF in normal lighting (the room still misses more often, but uncritically), did not have to be adjusted, which cannot be said about sigma 17-50 f2.8

Disadvantages: 1. Trailing trunk. It is constantly necessary after work to focus on infinity, or in the manual mode to twist the leaving part, otherwise you can inadvertently damage
2. Not the fastest autofocus motor (for me personally, this is not very important, yet it is not a reportage lens), and not quite silent when shooting video
3. The electronic focus ring did not like it, it works rather slowly in manual mode
four. Poor equipment, no hood and cover included

Comment: Cool budget lens in terms of price-quality, use paired with 70D.
Perfect for portraits and for shooting video with a shallow depth of field. The picture is nice, detailed, with flowers everything is in order. Given its cost, you can close your eyes to some drawbacks.

Advantages: All for 5 plus.

Disadvantages: Leaves the proboscis.

Comment: If someone tells you that the pictures are not very good with him, "throw a stone at him".

Advantages: 1) Excellent picture quality and sharpness (starting from f / 3.5). Yes, and in the open as such, no soap, everything is very decent.
2) Autofocus. It works very quickly and accurately, as well as quietly.
3) Low price. I bought in early 2017 for 9 thousand rubles.
4) Weight, size. Very compact, you can put it in your jacket pocket, it will not interfere at all.
5) Sufficient luminosity.
6) Build. Everything is well assembled, nothing creaks and does not play. The bayonet, unlike the previous version, is made of metal.
7) The design is very nice.

Disadvantages: For the price they simply do not.

Comment: The best lens in accordance with the price-quality. You can take without thinking. Taking pictures with him is a pleasure.

Advantages: Sharpness, weight, focusing speed, even pleasant bokeh, price !!!

Disadvantages: The only thing that could be attributed to the drawbacks is the change in size when focusing, respectively, over time, dust will appear inside.

Comment: I changed enough glasses to understand whether to like to shoot with glass or not. Of course he was the owner of the previous fifty dollars. I can definitely say that Canon once again made the perfect lens in the price-quality ratio !!! The tactile sensations are much nicer in the hand, I was pleased with the presence of a metal bayonet. But all this stuff) The main thing is how it focuses and of course the drawing! Rented to Canon 70D. Very pleased with the speed of focusing, accuracy and noiselessness (no annoying squeal). Now the normal pleasant bokeh, not the "nuts". At 1.8 soft, it becomes sharp from 2.0, at 2.2-2.8 it becomes very comfortable to shoot, sharp where necessary. I took him for 7990 and do not regret a penny spent, the main thing is comfortable for me to work with him, and customers are satisfied with the result !!!