Canon PowerShot G16
detailed information
9.8 / 10
Rating
Canon PowerShot G16 Specifications
Matrix | |
---|---|
Total number of pixels | 12.8 million |
Effective Pixels | 12.1 million |
The size | 1/1.7" |
Crop factor | 4.55 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 |
Matrix type | BSI CMOS |
Color depth | 36 bits |
Sensitivity | 80 - 3200 ISO, Auto ISO |
Extended ISO | ISO6400, ISO12800 |
Functionality | |
White balance | automatic, manual installation, from the list |
Flash | built-in, up to 5 m, the suppression of the red-eye effect, shoe |
Image Stabilizer (still photography) | optical moving element in the lens |
Shooting modes | |
Macro photography | there is |
Shooting speed | 12.2 fps |
Maximum series of shots | 5 for JPEG |
Timer | there is |
Timer time | 2, 10, 1-30 c |
Time-lapse mode | there is |
Aspect ratio (still photography) | 4:3, 3:2, 1:1, 16:9 |
Lens | |
Focal length (35 mm equivalent) | 28 - 140 mm |
Optical zoom | 5x |
Diaphragm | F1.8 - F2.8 |
The number of optical elements | 11 |
The number of groups of optical elements | 9 |
Features | aspherical lenses, low dispersed lenses |
Viewfinder and LCD screen | |
Viewfinder | optic |
Using the screen as a viewfinder | there is |
Viewfinder Field of View | 80% |
LCD screen | 922,000 points, 3 inches |
Exposition | |
Exposure | 250 - 1/4000 s |
Exposure X-Sync | 1/250 c |
Manual setting of shutter speed and aperture | there is |
Automatic exposure processing | shutter priority, aperture priority |
Exposure Correction | +/- 3 EV in 1/3 steps |
Exposure metering | center-weighted, common (Evaluative), point |
Exposure bracketing | there is |
Focusing | |
Autofocus type | contrast |
Autofocus backlight | there is |
Manual focus | there is |
Face focusing | there is |
Shooting distance | 0.01 m |
Memory and Interfaces | |
Type of memory cards | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
Image Formats | 2 JPEG, RAW |
Interfaces | USB 2.0, video, HDMI, audio, Wi-Fi |
Nutrition | |
Battery format | your own |
Number of batteries | 1 |
Battery capacity | 360 photos |
Video and audio recording | |
Video recording | there is |
Video recording format | Mp4 |
Video codecs | MPEG4 |
Maximum movie resolution | 1920x1080 |
Maximum video frame rate | 240 frames / s |
Maximum frame rate when shooting HD video | 25/30 frames / s with a resolution of 1280x720, 50/60 frames / s with a resolution of 1920x1080 |
Optical Zoom when recording video | there is |
Sound recording | there is |
Other functions and features | |
Digital Zoom | 4x |
Additional features | tripod mount, remote control, orientation sensor, HDR shooting |
Equipment | rechargeable battery, battery charger, camera strap, AC power cord |
Additional Information | 4: 5 shooting |
Dimensions and weight | |
The size | 109x76x40 mm |
Weight | 356 g with batteries |
Canon PowerShot G16 Reviews
Evaluation
5
Advantages: Lightweight and compact. Quality pictures and videos.
Disadvantages: Wi-fi connection with the camera did not work.
Comment: He took the second camera to the Canon 750D. Tired of his heavy carry everywhere. Canon PowerShot G16 - what you need for walking, hiking and traveling. Snapshots on level.
Nikonov Vladimir
March 10, 2015,
Krasnodar
\ Experience: several months
Evaluation
5
Advantages: Compact compared to the "SLR". Low noise level. Convenient management. Adequate price
Disadvantages: I would like a lens with a width of 24 mm. Optical viewfinder - however, you can not pay attention to it.
Comment: I chose as a second compact camera a couple of my "mirror" with a dozen lenses. I have high claims on the technical quality of images. That is why he approached this issue seriously, went shopping and tested.
In addition to this model, I compared compact analogs with a large matrix from Nikon, Panasonic, Olympus, Canon, Fuji, Sony and Samsung. Almost all disappointed, except for the technology of two companies.
First of all, I check the noise of the matrix using a special test, since this problem is able to spoil all the other advantages. I think that the ability to photograph without visible noise at high ISO is very important for the tourist - in museums and churches often the lighting is very weak. And if you do not see the noise in your photos - this does not mean that other people do not see the noise.
Canon G-16 has undeniable noise advantages:
1) Even if you shoot in JPG, then very little noise starts from ISO 800-1000 and up to 1600 is quite working. Few of the competitors, even much more expensive, behave so well at high ISO. However, many people will not even notice this, since browser programs and other primitive viewing programs clearly simplify images and crush noise, regardless of the viewer's desire. It should look only in Photoshop with a scale of 100% and on a high-quality monitor.
2) Better situation in RAW. But where is better? Few cameras with larger matrices, incl. SLR, can boast such sensitivity.
3) Decent high definition lens.
4) Convenient control for a person accustomed to a professional camera with a large number of manual settings. All the necessary parameters are easily and quickly accessible.
A picky photographer looking for a second camera to his “SLR” and well understanding quality will be pleased, especially considering the reasonable price. G16 is able to make photos no worse than budget "DSLRs."
Earlier, I bought a Canon G-15 for my daughter and also checked it. Not much difference was found between the G-15 and G-16. The video did not shoot.
In addition to this model, I compared compact analogs with a large matrix from Nikon, Panasonic, Olympus, Canon, Fuji, Sony and Samsung. Almost all disappointed, except for the technology of two companies.
First of all, I check the noise of the matrix using a special test, since this problem is able to spoil all the other advantages. I think that the ability to photograph without visible noise at high ISO is very important for the tourist - in museums and churches often the lighting is very weak. And if you do not see the noise in your photos - this does not mean that other people do not see the noise.
Canon G-16 has undeniable noise advantages:
1) Even if you shoot in JPG, then very little noise starts from ISO 800-1000 and up to 1600 is quite working. Few of the competitors, even much more expensive, behave so well at high ISO. However, many people will not even notice this, since browser programs and other primitive viewing programs clearly simplify images and crush noise, regardless of the viewer's desire. It should look only in Photoshop with a scale of 100% and on a high-quality monitor.
2) Better situation in RAW. But where is better? Few cameras with larger matrices, incl. SLR, can boast such sensitivity.
3) Decent high definition lens.
4) Convenient control for a person accustomed to a professional camera with a large number of manual settings. All the necessary parameters are easily and quickly accessible.
A picky photographer looking for a second camera to his “SLR” and well understanding quality will be pleased, especially considering the reasonable price. G16 is able to make photos no worse than budget "DSLRs."
Earlier, I bought a Canon G-15 for my daughter and also checked it. Not much difference was found between the G-15 and G-16. The video did not shoot.
Chernomashentsev Vladimir
October 25, 2014,
Moscow
\ Experience: several months
Evaluation
5
Comment: Photo quality is much better than the Canon 600d with a whale lens.
Automatic - super! All manual settings are very convenient and I like very much that the result is immediately visible on the screen, which will work out (in 600d the live view mode is very slow, so it’s absolutely impossible to use it)! Blur background - beautiful!
In general, usually all after soap trays switch to SLRs, and after 2 years with a SLR I switched to this camera and am very satisfied! I advise everyone!
Automatic - super! All manual settings are very convenient and I like very much that the result is immediately visible on the screen, which will work out (in 600d the live view mode is very slow, so it’s absolutely impossible to use it)! Blur background - beautiful!
In general, usually all after soap trays switch to SLRs, and after 2 years with a SLR I switched to this camera and am very satisfied! I advise everyone!
October 13, 2014,
Dnipropetrovsk
\ Experience: less than a month
Evaluation
5
Advantages: Excellent burst speed.
Quality of the received photos
Video 120 frames / sec.
Perfectly shoots under water (as it is known, colors deteriorate there with greater depth)
Quality of the received photos
Video 120 frames / sec.
Perfectly shoots under water (as it is known, colors deteriorate there with greater depth)
Disadvantages: A bit small zoom
With active shooting, the battery quickly sits down
With active shooting, the battery quickly sits down
Comment: I have been using this camera for almost a year. Love from the first frame. I bought it specially for underwater photography (because I am diving), not knowing how many more positive discoveries I will discover for myself in this seemingly small and unpretentious machine. My first acquaintance with the Canon PowerShot G16 happened exactly under water. I was amazed at the quality of the shooting. The lights are so saturated !!! The quality of the photo - without comment)))) Buying a fotik for only one purpose (underwater shooting), he practically replaced my DSLR for me. Easy, convenient, and most importantly, I can take it everywhere with me. Mirror so you will not drag. And how he photographs at night !!! Just amazing. Now all my friends, having got acquainted with the Canon PowerShot G16, wish themselves the same. And it has a great slow motion video feature. In my case it is very convenient when shooting trampoline)))
Park Svetik
September 10, 2014,
Moscow
\ Experience: several months
Evaluation
5
Advantages: -compactness
- not bad image quality,
- just the same elegant ergonomics of camera control: it fits perfectly in your hand, it is easily and intuitively controlled,
- FullHD video shooting mode improved to the maximum from the possible - a significant jump in relation to the previous G15 and no worse than any SONY RX-100 II (I specifically compared the video in both cameras),
-good aperture lens ...
-Excellent, as always Japanese, the quality of the camera ...
- not bad image quality,
- just the same elegant ergonomics of camera control: it fits perfectly in your hand, it is easily and intuitively controlled,
- FullHD video shooting mode improved to the maximum from the possible - a significant jump in relation to the previous G15 and no worse than any SONY RX-100 II (I specifically compared the video in both cameras),
-good aperture lens ...
-Excellent, as always Japanese, the quality of the camera ...
Disadvantages: - I would like a slightly wider wide angle, and a larger matrix, so that the quality of the pictures becomes generally excellent, but then the camera size will increase significantly or not, but then you have to sacrifice either the focal length range, or the aperture, and the camera will become less universal .. .
-sound during video shooting could be a little better (a noise filter could be a bit more efficient)
-sound during video shooting could be a little better (a noise filter could be a bit more efficient)
Comment: ... an excellent universal compact for those who want to be with the camera light!
PS: ..... everything would be fine if the sound when shooting a video was cleaner, without noise ...
PS: ..... everything would be fine if the sound when shooting a video was cleaner, without noise ...
Chernoivan Alexander
August 03, 2014,
Moscow
\ Experience: less than a month
Evaluation
5
Advantages: Very bright continuous shooting
Disadvantages: - Shutters! Or rather their distance to the lens. If a grain of sand gets on the lens and it is not blown off in time, then the curtains will scratch the lens with it. In general, it is strange that this disease of the G series has not been eliminated so far :(
- Wi-Fi. Why is it here, I did not understand. Drive pictures? Faster camera pick up ...
- Often white balance suffers: (
- Wi-Fi. Why is it here, I did not understand. Drive pictures? Faster camera pick up ...
- Often white balance suffers: (
Comment: Perfect replacement for my DSLR (600D). Always at hand. Going on a trip just enough of this camera.
Sergey Tikhomirov
July 29, 2014,
Lyubertsy
\ Experience: several months
Evaluation
5
Advantages: Fast AF, lightweight, compact, does not attract the attention of others, can be carried in your pocket, decent quality JPEG, comfortable focal, ISO 1000 quite working, ideal for traveling light.
Disadvantages: For a compact, it's silly to look for them, they are all known before the purchase, the device is fully consistent with its purpose. HA sometimes get out, if the photo is valuable - they can be easily removed in Photoshop, for example. From the optical viewfinder no sense, it would be better to put the electronic.
Comment: I am satisfied with the purchase, I do not discuss the price, it is what it is, do not want it, do not take it, as they say, nobody forces it. Evaluation set to 5, because I knew about the shortcomings before buying what I wanted and got it.
P.S. Many say, for this price, you can take a DSLR or mirrorless, but you will not get what you are taking compacts for - low weight and size.
I supplement in a month. Fotik very much, really fits in a pocket of jeans, now always with you. I tried portraits, in jpeg excessive sharpness, it is better to shoot in RAW, it is still necessary to do without an editor. Jpeg is also good for walking and traveling, the BB is quite adequate, the matrix metering is also rarely wrong with the exposure,
Sample photos taken in jpeg, with a little processing. So far, only macro laid out, the first 100% crop. It would be necessary to get a macrolinza.
P.S. Many say, for this price, you can take a DSLR or mirrorless, but you will not get what you are taking compacts for - low weight and size.
I supplement in a month. Fotik very much, really fits in a pocket of jeans, now always with you. I tried portraits, in jpeg excessive sharpness, it is better to shoot in RAW, it is still necessary to do without an editor. Jpeg is also good for walking and traveling, the BB is quite adequate, the matrix metering is also rarely wrong with the exposure,
Sample photos taken in jpeg, with a little processing. So far, only macro laid out, the first 100% crop. It would be necessary to get a macrolinza.
andrvrn
April 23, 2014,
Voronezh
\ Experience: several months
Evaluation
5
Advantages: high sensitivity and shooting speed in serial mode
Disadvantages: did not reveal
Comment: I am not a professional, I didn’t have a solid business with DSLRs. After cameras range 5-10 tr. Different manufacturers g16 - amazing quality photos.
I bought because of the high-speed serial shooting - before the children turned out “a second after”, the cameras did not have time. And with high-speed shooting - the thing is all on time. I photograph almost only in this mode. (The memory card quickly ends, but that is another question;) take a bigger size and should be a high class)
And I was very pleased with the photosensitivity: in a room without a flash I am taking pictures now, even in serial mode, it turns out very worthy.
I bought because of the high-speed serial shooting - before the children turned out “a second after”, the cameras did not have time. And with high-speed shooting - the thing is all on time. I photograph almost only in this mode. (The memory card quickly ends, but that is another question;) take a bigger size and should be a high class)
And I was very pleased with the photosensitivity: in a room without a flash I am taking pictures now, even in serial mode, it turns out very worthy.
Vasiliev Vladimir
March 13, 2014,
Moscow
\ Experience: several months
Evaluation
5
Advantages: Smart on the focus, but the brakes DSLR 1.5 times. Rapid - 12 frames per second. There is a mode HDR - 3 frames are made at a speed of 12 frames / sec. Good noise. Great video: FullHD 60 frames / sec, stereo. There are no restrictions on shooting time. Image stabilizer works in video mode. Settings - horror (you can spend a whole year to study their combinations). Strap through the neck - fotik felt, but the neck does not pull. The screen is not swivel, lens with automatic shutter. A large-diameter lens (compared to other soap cases), with an optical stabilizer and quite high-aperture: 1.8..2.8.
Disadvantages: The small matrix is the only significant flaw in this fotik. In the video mode, the stabilizer is sometimes lost and a “jump” of the frame is obtained. Also in the video mode, the autofocus slows down (so we first focus and then turn on the recording). Can not FullHD with a frequency of 50 frames per second, but we are still in the PAL zone ...
Comment: For myself, I decided that "the Chukchi is not a photographer, but a videographer," i. I shoot a HOME video more than I take a photo, and at the amateur level. I have a Canon HV10, Sony SLT-A55, Panasonic HC-X920, Canon G16. What can I say: the G16 completely overlaps the HV10 in the video area. The HC-X920 video shoots steeper than the G16 and the chip is not even in picture quality (the quality is at the height of both devices), but in the hybrid stabilizer and the convenient grip HC-X920. G16 is a camera in form, so it is rather difficult to hold it in your hands during video recording (sometimes a shake in the hands is “struck” by the stabilizer). SLT-A55 - overheating of the matrix really infuriates ...
Buy for this camera large capacity flash drives - from 32GB (Class 10+), t. It is very likely that you will shoot more video on it than a photo. About the battery - enough for 1 hour of video shooting. So buy a spare ...
There are too many settings - I would have less custom and more automatic ones :)
Why is there a viewfinder when there is such a cool screen - I don’t understand :)
Buy for this camera large capacity flash drives - from 32GB (Class 10+), t. It is very likely that you will shoot more video on it than a photo. About the battery - enough for 1 hour of video shooting. So buy a spare ...
There are too many settings - I would have less custom and more automatic ones :)
Why is there a viewfinder when there is such a cool screen - I don’t understand :)
Vinokurov Ilya
November 25, 2013,
Moscow
\ Experience: less than a month
Evaluation
5
Advantages: A bright, high quality photo for this category (including at full zoom), video - 1080p60 at the level of good video cameras + records sound well. Excellent stabilizer.
Disadvantages: Slightly heavy, the matrix would be bigger (although with such an objective lens and so well), expensive. Nope DLNA! (why then wi-fi is not clear at all).
Comment: I've been playing for a month now. Though I am not a pro, but the photos are excellent. Before that, I had a sony digital video camera, but I realized that I was taking mostly photos. It seems not lost.
Video - elegant smoothness and clarity in panoramic shooting.
Photos - excellent colors and clarity, even at maximum zoom.
For ficromompact - great. With mirrors of course you should not compare.
You can connect directly to LG smart TV - reads both photos and videos.
Video - elegant smoothness and clarity in panoramic shooting.
Photos - excellent colors and clarity, even at maximum zoom.
For ficromompact - great. With mirrors of course you should not compare.
You can connect directly to LG smart TV - reads both photos and videos.
Anonymusov Yuri
November 14, 2013,
Moscow
\ Experience: less than a month
Canon PowerShot G16 is selected in rating:
Top 5 cameras for beginners