HP Webcam HD 4310

Advantages: Appearance, clear picture

Disadvantages: Not enough luminosity

Comment: In general, this camera is an amateur. The main plus is the clarity of the picture. But straining her demands for lighting. Compared 3 webcams at the same time. One is built into the laptop, the other is an old logitek and HP. The first two do not suffer from dropped frames, like HP, but there is a shortage of details. HP's color rendering is also not the best, but not the worst.

Advantages: Full HD, rarity for a given price
Autofocus

Disadvantages: Tolerable tolerance, no thread under the tripod

Comment: First webcam. Took exclusively for streams. In obs webcam is configured more conveniently and more diverse than through firewood HP (I strongly advise against even installing them, lowering the quality and frame rate without the possibility of changing them).
In terms of price-quality ratio is an excellent option.

Advantages: "Found" at work, for the sake of interest, I stuck it in a computer and without any shamanism it went up in arch linux - there is sound through pulse, there is also a picture in skype. At home, the Logitech C920 had to tinker a bit before it worked as it should. Another plus is the inconspicuous work indication light in the form of a pale white dot — great for spyware. Small and neat. There are some buttons, but they are as add. keyboard keys are not visible, because, probably, they work only under Windows through proprietary drivers.

Disadvantages: We run obs, set 1920x1080, switch to the YV12 video format and get an honest 30 fps - that is, we still need to set up a little bit sometimes, because in the YUYV4 format: 2: 2 there will be only 5 frames per second - so who will soap is your cant, not glands. The video quality, of course, is worse than the Logitech C920, however, everything depends heavily on the lighting - as always with cheap cameras. The mount is too flimsy - the camera can move even under the weight of its own wire, and even more so it will have to be corrected after each pressing the button on the camera itself.

Comment: In terms of price / quality ratio better than Logitech C920.

Advantages: Good option for webcam

Disadvantages: For fast moving objects not suitable -30fps

Comment: So the webcam for use is good, the image is clear, 13MP for photos by characteristics.
I extended the USB cable with a cord and tried to take a picture on the street, the result was not pleased — the cars on the road on the image moved with jerks or even jumps.
Removed from the same place the video on the phone with the same 30fps according to the characteristics, on it the cars go smoothly.
That is, the reading processor in the camera is still weak. But for a house where you only need to remove facial expressions and small movements, the HP4310 webcam is quite suitable, the image is clear even in dim light.

Advantages: Auto focus, small, stylish look, quite a long cord.

Disadvantages: poorly kept on the monitor (rubbing dust can knock it down) but not critical

Comment: I bought it, installed it, connected the cable to the port and everything is ready! The video quality is excellent, excellent compared to more expensive competitors, I did not install additional programs because I do not need it for Skype! I recommend to buy it!

Advantages: Great picture, good price, autofocus, sound, mount, rotation in two planes.

Disadvantages: Not.

Comment: I connected and configured automatically, very quickly.Cameras from other manufacturers with similar characteristics, such as Logitech, cost about 1000 p. expensive. Great camera.

Advantages: An excellent microphone, no matter where the room is located, the volume level does not change. Quality with standard settings pulls up to 8 out of 10, and if podshamanit through a useful utility from disk, then 11 out of 10)))

Disadvantages: Unless I wanted a larger viewing angle.

Comment: Cool webcam, chose to price up to 2000r. Along with Logitech, A4tech and Microsoft, I gave preference to HP, they produce products not "anyhow." I highly recommend))