Marshall Mid A.N.C.

Advantages: They sit comfortably, do not press anything and do not rub after an hour and a half.
Excellent sound insulation. Just without noise cancellation, a lot of sounds are going well, with noise cancellation turned on, it becomes even quieter, an ordinary subway train (the old one) becomes almost inaudible even with not very loud music.
Case included, foldable design. Joystick pleasant, does not stand out from the general style.
Very large volume margin.
The sound is generally good, but with nuances, they will be lower.

Disadvantages: I don’t cost my money, I took it with a big discount, so it turned out a bit more expensive than the regular version without active noise cancellation, I wouldn’t give more for it.
Relatively large, the model is like a consignment note, but it feels like full-sized.
When you turn on noise reduction, the nature of the sound changes slightly, but the sound is lower.

Comment: Now in detail about the sound.
Compared with B & W P3 and P5. Plays better than P3 and on a level with P5, but with nuances. At B & W, the sound is more driving, smoother in the middle and tops, but less detailed.
The sound of these headphones is very detailed, but everything spoils the peak on the clicking sounds, the cymbals are very loud, the "Sss" always stands out for the vocals.
If you turn on the noise cancellation, then the bass becomes smaller, perhaps the microphones in the headphones react to the sound of the headphones and quench the bass.
Since I listen to music in transport, the main goal was to remove extraneous noises, the headphones cope with this perfectly, and without too much rubbish and music enjoyment more, comparing with models without noise cancellation in the subway, the Marshal is definitely better.
If you think about buying, be sure to compare with competitors, the model is perfect for any genre except metal and the like with it where you need a lot of drive.

Advantages: Sound, insulation, quality, beautiful and practical case included

Disadvantages: Greatly overpriced price

Comment: I do not understand the music and sound issues, just bought for the sake of interest. I liked the headphones. I didn’t find a cardinal difference from my other earplugs (AKG for 4000 rubles, which come bundled with the Galaxy S8 and S9) to be direct wow. There is a difference, but not great, AKG is definitely better than bass, the marshal has a more uniform sound across all frequencies. But this is most likely because, after a certain price category, the differences in the headphones are already minimal for an average listener, not for audiophiles.
According to some reviews they put pressure on their ears. I'm fine, they sit perfectly. Declared 30 hours of work from a single charge, 5 days have passed since the purchase, but have not yet charged, so I readily believe.
Separately, it is necessary to say about noise insulation, it is excellent. And the additional option ANC only makes a little better, but not critical, despite the fact that the overpayment for this option is already double compared to the usual version of Marshall mid.
Specifically, I would not recommend this model - too much overpayment for active noise insulation, which is already excellent. Instead, I advise Mid without ANC.

Advantages: Overhead "ears" with high-quality reception, calmly catch really 10 meters and do not fall off at the wrong time. The lungs sit comfortably on your head, you do not feel them even if you wear them for a long time. There is a connector for the wire, if necessary.

Disadvantages: In fact, I like everything.

Comment: Ergonomic and very high-quality headphones with high-quality sound, the Marshal still does quality things. There is an active noise reduction, really a working thing, especially felt in the subway car. In this case, the battery keeps even with its activation decently, well, about 19-20 hours.