Polaris PFS 0213

Advantages: Easy to use and wash!

Disadvantages: The adjustment knob seems flimsy, but for now everything works fine. I hope this is my wrong opinion.

Comment: Price-quality ratio! Very happy with the purchase!

Advantages: Compact, at the same time rather capacious, the price optimum, functions good

Disadvantages: Did not see

Comment: Bought recently, but appreciated the benefits immediately. The steamer is quite compact, but at the same time roomy. Cope with its functions perfectly, the food turns out very tasty, with a book of recipes - in general everything is easy. The price is very affordable, compared with other models - I did not see the point of overpaying))

Advantages: Convenient, small, compact, easy to use.

Disadvantages: Can not see the water level. This is the only negative for me.

Comment: I often make beetroot salads, but after it, washing the pots and constantly checking for the presence of water was very stressful, so I wanted to try a steamer. The choice stopped on the Polaris PFS 0213, as a miniature (compared to others) well, I just liked the interface.
I use the year already and I am very glad that I bought it. I put it on a timer and forgot. The instruction is informative. It has recommendations on how much time you need to cook a particular product, recipes and useful tips. The only thing that concerns beets or other larger vegetables, for which, cooking takes more than an hour, you need to add water. It's bad that there is no glass window to see the amount of water, but its presence can be determined by a couple from under the lid. Accordingly, if the steam does not go, you need to top up. For me, this is the only negative.

Advantages: Small, light, simple, inexpensive

Disadvantages: Not found

Comment: With the advent of the child and the introduction of feeding, thinking about buying a double boiler. I chose the simplest one, because there is also a slow cooker, therefore, apart from steaming food, nothing was required of the steamer.
Steamer light, very compact, takes up little space. Handling it is simply disgraceful: I poured water, put a thicket (or two), turned it on, left, and came to a cheerful bdink about the end of work. After reading the reviews, I immediately removed the plastic cone from the heating element (by the way, neither the instruction in it nor the fact that it exists and does not need a word), I pour less water than the maximum level, and nothing pours from anywhere. There is a tray for collecting juice. Cooking vegetables, cutlets, meat, fish, even cook eggs (that is, soar) in a double boiler, everything turns out very tasty.
In the water bowl, scale builds up very quickly, but this is a claim to tap water, you can boil it with citric acid or a special agent (like a kettle) and order.

Advantages: compact and lightweight, compactly assembled and takes up little space during storage. It works perfectly, is easy to handle, there is a book of recipes and it says a lot in the manual about how much time to cook. Low price.

Disadvantages: not found.

Comment: I bought it and did not regret it; I cooked fish, vegetables, cutlets, tried out recipes from a book.Everyone is completely satisfied, and even for such a price. By the way, the smell of plastic was never. Yes, but do not pour water into the bottom bowl.

Advantages: Compact, nice design, easy to clean and assemble.

Disadvantages: Strongly boils water in the drip pan and bottom container.

Comment: Neither could I lose weight after giving birth and decided to start with proper nutrition, because age and even ate everything that moves during pregnancy, 5 kg then went away, but 15 you need to get somewhere. And since our state does "everything" so that children would be born and pay children's pennies, you won’t particularly run away and you had to choose from the budget option. There was one such design and a nice one, and there wasn’t much fancy, I don’t want to cook. I bought it and decided to cook vegetables for Venegret on the same evening. Water is poured up to a maximum, spread out vegetables, as it should be, down beets, up carrots and potatoes, and started the process. Delivered for 30 minutes. After 15 minutes, she looked and was unpleasantly surprised, the water was poured into the lower container and flowed out and the vegetables were half in the water. Poured to half, set again. After 10 minutes, the water again began to flow into the lower bowl of the container at 1/3, but it did not pour out. I had enough half a cup of water to cook the vegetables to the end. In 30 minutes everything boiled over, the potatoes are crumbly, the beets are soft. Conclusion made this: water tank rather low, to the mark max. pour not worth it. The co-receiver is too low, if it was higher, the water would not flow out. In this regard, it is possible to cook only vegetables in the lower container;