Samsung T27H390SI

Advantages: Specifications
Bad smart

Disadvantages: in fairness one is a bad picture of digital SD channels
native stand crooked - slightly tilted to the right

Comment: Smart is able to turn in the browser - youtube FHD 60k / s at one and a half speed! But it can not keep active even a couple of tabs, either the RAM is not enough, or so the axis is configured.
Smart through the hub sees wired keyboard and mouse, on the keyboard, even the layouts are changed by the combination of alt + shift (but either from the first time or from the fourth).
In general, I think the disadvantage is that the model was not made an android monoblock, it would be quite adequate relics.
About the picture: I can compare it with 23 "FHD, 43" FHD and 29 "HD skis, all skis are very (VERY) far away on the quality of the picture of digital SD channels. I look and give up on how bad it is and about settings. There are no complaints about FHD channels.
Mirakast works, the choice of aspect ratios is excessive even (but the ratios remain, alas, for all channels). That's like everything, a normal TV from a company with a name.
Let me, as a virtue, note that there is no rubbish like ivy on the console (in the menu of this "good" of course in bulk).

Advantages: it turned out to be practically the only one that got into a niche up to 385 mm high and at the same time Full HD. I took it with caution - given the different reviews about him, such as
- very weak TV - tuner - no tuner turned out to be regular, not strong and not weak, but as usual, I saw everything that was given to the input. Helped advice - choose a provider - another.
- All analog channels shows very well, practically and there is no need to look for digital ones.
- TV management is difficult - no, management is exactly the same as on other TVs of this brand.
- there is practically no principle of intuitive accessibility - here the author apparently smoked, I still did not understand what it was about.
- the image size has only three settings for all channels - yes, it is, but one selected covers everything you need, you don’t have to change practically.
- smart is also standard, connected, shows, is it only necessary?
- the screen has flare at the edges - did not see, maybe I just do not know how to search for flare?
- fastening on the bracket is flimsy, screws M4 - the way it is. but not very flimsy, quite working, considering. that the device itself is not heavy. put it on CZK 121v - fine.

Disadvantages: There are always flaws, I would say that the contrast could be a little higher, although it lowered the brightness and backlight, but still there is a feeling that there is a lot of light.
there is no switch on the TV, and the power supply is external - you just have to pull it out of the network.

Comment: quite decent machine. which has no analogues in its nomination, so the price bites.in the photo it seems more flawed than it actually is. I think Samsung is one of the successful models.

Advantages: High resolution, natural and pleasant colors, high speed of the OS, ample use

Disadvantages: There is no TV on TV, but I would also like to have the “Smart” control panel. Staff all the same is not so convenient.

Comment: I needed a model to replace almost the same in the minibus, but with a smart TV. It was probably the only decent option with 1080p in this size. And he met all expectations. In general, not a single minus, except for the remote. Applications fly, the 2TB hard drive reads faster than the home flagship.

Advantages: Appearance, matte screen, image quality, quick turn on, turns on at the same moment on which it was turned off. Many scolded the sound, but personally everything suits me, the kitchen is perfect, the speakers are located below, the TV hangs on the wall above the table and everything is clearly audible, and if the extractor or microwave does not work, then you can watch at 10-15% volume.

Disadvantages: The console is very old-school and uncomfortable, there is no voice input. Nedosmart (very few available applications, unlike the usual android TV). The interface is not very smart.

Comment: He took for a small kitchen, about 2.5x4m, the TV fit perfectly. I bought it only for viewing YouTube, it copes with its task perfectly.

Advantages: The quality of the picture. Not heavy, installation on the wall is not a problem even in one person. It should be within reason.

Disadvantages: On his stand was not quite exactly. I would like to mount on the wall in the kit.

Comment: The IP TV set-top box did not work with its HDMI cord, stuck the cord that came with the TV set, it all worked right away. No problem hanging on a small Kromax Optima 102, the depth of this fastener is enough to turn / tilt the telly. I hung up the IP TV console for the telecom and still the telly could bend over a bit. In this size, there seems to be no other decent models. I advise you to buy!

Advantages: Full HD, excellent viewing angles, Wi-Fi works without problems, receiving speed of 28 Mbps, DVB-T2 to the Goldmaster GM-500 passive antenna caught all 29 channels of 3 Ostankino multiplexes 50 km to MO, the console is standardly sane, without problems . You can install additional. applications. YouTube remembers the place where you interrupted viewing. Body - approx.

Disadvantages: The sound is acceptable, loud, but after connecting through an old music center - I want to improve the acoustics. To do this, there is AUX headphone output (the new LG does not, only optics).
1 usb input

Comment: Tested with heavy FullHD rollers (snipers, swings, etc.) - no jerking and slide show, everything is smooth.
In the diagonal 24-28 "the most decent smart TV even to the kitchen, at least to where (took to the kitchen, in bedroom 49" LG 4K).