SUPRA DRS-SG171V

Advantages: It works reliably. There are almost no false alarms. And there is nothing to say!

Disadvantages: one). And nevertheless happens "lies". According to the villages in the Krasnodar Territory there is a place with an active sun and with a combination of some factors. All the radars there "howl" without ceasing 30 kilometers. And this is no exception - it sings incessantly, without naming the name of the radar.
2). The base is not relevant. The latest radar database was updated at the end of May from the official site. And in fact a lot of radar, in June, they were already removed from the highway (there is a marking on the asphalt - a warning, there is a place on the pole where the radar was) - the anti-radar scares from scratch.
3). Antiradar only two times for 900 km., But confused and corrected itself with the name of the radar model.

Comment: Signature radar is a thing. The antiradar actually works, avoiding false alarms and more often is silent. I was scared several times - I drove through the city to the machine and here I see an installed tripod with a radar, but the anti-radar does not react. If you go in the village, observing the speed limit - the anti-radar is silent, whether the installed radar is working or not.

Advantages: New signature generation firmware, nice design, does not jump off suckers

Disadvantages: Not found

Comment: I got it because it was absolutely impossible to drive with my old whistler, too many false positives, and, one might say, it does not catch new complexes. With the supra 171 there is another picture altogether - and there are fewer false orders and so far have not noticed radar passes. The database warns about various video complexes that are not detected by anything. The base is easy to update via USB cord. Went with him to the south, very much helped out, caught both trinogs and stationary radars for 5+, did not bring a single fine, although at times he heaped up and +50

Advantages: Quality goods, reasonable price

Disadvantages: In the process of daily operation they did not show up, unless sometimes the radar signature is still incorrect.

Comment: Having hung myself this device, I realized that you should not deny yourself modern technology. The problem of false positives, which tormented in the past few years has become irrelevant! Yes, 99% of all interferences are successfully cut off and the device works only on dangerous signal sources, ignoring interferences. Money was paid for a reason, at least it was very helpful in a trip to Tatarstan, and there everything is packed with cameras and the so-called "cuckoos", which is called to the eyeballs, did not bring any fines.

Advantages: The database of stationary radars is updated regularly - it warns not only about stationary radars, but also about the traffic police cameras and posts, calling them radars as well. Workmanship is normal, the settings are simple and clear. It supports autodoria and can recognize radars by signatures. Works stably without freezes and glitches. Determining the stationary radar on the base can also report on their performance by the detector. When traveling in the control zone, Avtodoria shows the current average speed at the site.

Disadvantages: In the Track mode, it constantly shows the presence of interference in the K-range, which it apparently catches in the car itself, although there are no radiating equipment in the car except for parking sensors. For this reason, Expert mode is enabled all the time.
In Expert mode, some interference from machines and motion control sensors according to signatures is defined as radar, for example, Cordon, i.e. obviously wrong. Depending on the terrain and the installation point of the radar, it may be late or not react at all to a really working radar.
On the M1 highway, sections with the Avtodoria control in the database are 40-70 km long, as a result, the radar beeps long and tedious at the beginning and end of the section, and the sound has to be made to a minimum.

Comment: Passed with the device on the M4 to the Crimea and back with a constant speeding of 20-40 km / h. As a result, I received 3 fines from Chris radars in the amount of 1000в‚в including discount. In two cases, apparently warned late, as a result did not have time to completely slow down, in the third case, he was completely silent. Although in general during the trip, Chris radars determined by signatures. I can conclude that this radar detector does not guarantee a complete and timely warning of all non-stationary radars, so hope for a radar detector, but don’t make it yourself.

Advantages: quiet operation, adequate firmware

Disadvantages: not

Comment: Tired of triggered Tuareg and other clever cars, so he set himself the goal of updating the radar himself in the new season, as new signature detection technologies arrived. There is a choice on the market, but I gave preference to this manufacturer, since I like the approach to supporting users and democratic politics. I do not regret the device is worth the money. He filters a lot of useless signals that a normal radar would have beeped to - this is the main gesheft, now I go quietly, and it will detect level of hospitals and trinogs where necessary. I know in advance where to slow down. Tell me why it is needed when there is a Yandex navigator? My answer is, not all ride only in Moscow.

Advantages: GPS, display, clearly catches radar.

Disadvantages: If I find I will edit the review

Comment: No false positives. Well, almost there. This radar is just awesome. At the traffic police trap while signaling far. Just yesterday, I almost fell into an ambush with the Vizier - the radar warned me very well about a kilometer away, showed a K range. On our local CRIS-P, he says, not K, but Chris, directly defines his type. Antiradar is good. What I bought - no regrets.