Ratings Selection New technologies Reviews

TP-LINK TL-WR841N

detailed information
9.1 / 10
Rating

TP-LINK TL-WR841N specifications

General characteristics
Type of Wi-Fi access point
Wireless standard 802.11n, 2.4 GHz frequency
MIMO support there is
Max. wireless connection speed 300 Mbps
Reception / Transmission
Protection of information WEP, WPA, WPA2, 802.1x
Transmitter power 20 dBM
Access Point / Bridge Options
Switch 4xLAN
Port speed 100 Mbps
Router
Router there is
Firewall (FireWall) there is
NAT there is
SPI there is
DHCP server there is
Dynamic DNS support there is
Demilitarized Zone (DMZ) there is
Static routing there is
VPN
VPN pass through support there is
PPTP support there is
L2TP support there is
IPSec support there is
Antenna
Number of external antennas 2 x 5 dBi
Type of external antenna fixed
Monitoring and Configuring
Web interface there is
Additionally
Flash memory there is
Dimensions (WxHxD) 200x28x140 mm

TP-LINK TL-WR841N Reviews

Evaluation 4
Advantages: The speed of the wafer provider (90-95 Mbit), is configured simply, do not go under the torrent.
Disadvantages: Not suitable for networks with VPN connection. When using iptv, it hangs every couple of days (it is treated by reboot)
Comment: put about fifty such routers in different networks. All connections keeps, under load does not fall. This router is an excellent choice for networks with a connection type of DHCP, Static IP, PPPOE. There may be difficulties with connections like VPN. IPsec cannot be registered in L2TP, MPPE cannot be enabled in the FTAP (on native firmware, it can be connected to dvrt, but it will decently kill the connection speed). Now about IPTV. Suitable for wired use iptv, but will hang once a couple of days. For Wi-Fi, IPTV is suitable for SD channels, everything in HD starts to scatter a picture (tested on several DUNE HD models). The power of the antennas is average, I did not see anything outstanding, it would be suitable for a two-room apartment, I would not have put it in a treshka anymore. The speed keeps a normal 100mb with a normal receiver will give out easily. From the conclusions: An excellent router for a small apartment, it performs its functions with a bang, if the VPN network and / or you need an iptw on the wafer, look at 842 models, there are more settings and more iptv load it holds much better.
Beglarian gosha May 23, 2014, St. Petersburg \ Experience: several months
Evaluation 5
Advantages: Convenient setting, not a bad signal, speed at a height. Pulls 5 different devices, at different ends of the house, no problem.
Disadvantages: Sometimes after switching on, it does not immediately see the network.
Comment: Bought for the New Year. I connected quickly, the speed is perfect, ping to speedtest 29-35, LG TV with SMART TV, iPhone4, Sumsung Galaxy Ace, Asus laptop and a PC connected via port 1. Works more than a month, the TV set is in the opposite part of the apartment. But it works great. Pulls even at the entrance to the entrance, and this is the opposite wall of the house, it is worth considering that I live on the 2nd floor. I will update the review, in the course of use.
Pershin Nikolay February 01, 2014, Nizhny Novgorod \ Experience: several months
Evaluation 5
Advantages: price
Disadvantages: cuts speed upward (upload)
Comment: there were no problems with wi-fi, the apartment gives quite a sure reception (50 m2), the neighbor from below also clings without problems. while there are no problems when connecting any devices: 2 laptops, tablet, 2 mobile phones - never had any problems.
[there are no problems now - see below]
Problems with cutting speed up (via WAN). Connection 40 Mbit / s. On the download, these 40 stably produce, on the return - the pipe, even a 1MB picture on the mail is a problem to download. At the same time, by connecting the computer directly without a router, I received my 40 Mbit / s in both directions. it seems that the problem with the Ethernet controller: having kicked a router, sometimes it is possible to switch it to 10 mbps for Etherneta - then it will pop up and down 10.
In the end, I buy Kinetics ...

P.S. The problem got away - everything is OK with the router.just in case, I decided to over-crimp the cable - it turned out that the cable was poorly pressed when laying the line to the apartment. so here ...
Alex cousin October 14, 2013, Chekhov \ Experience: over a year
Evaluation 5
Advantages: Reliable
Sea of ​​settings
A bit warm
Cheapest, I guess
Disadvantages: Not found
Comment: In the ratio of price and quality is no better, DLNA, WI-FI, everything works at the same time, I really enjoyed using, not a single comment to the work. I use the month, everything is fine, it does not hang, the speed is like with a direct (plug in the computer) connection. Of course, I recommend !!!
Alexey Pichugin August 4, 2013, Yaroslavl \ Experience: several months
Evaluation 5
Advantages: Quality of work.
Of course the price (750 rubles.).
Tumbler on / off for wi-fi (when you don’t use the network, you can turn it off, and less radiation for the body, and you don’t interfere with the neighboring networks).
The antenna range.
Disadvantages: As a niggle - fixed antennas (someone might be flawed, but it does not matter to me).
No longer found for such and such money))
Comment: Now essentially. Device purchased 3 days ago. Firmware immediately after the purchase flooded the newest (for the current date) 3.14.19 Build 130122 Rel.43330n, from the official site.
Router v8.3, provider Beeline, L2TP, speed 40/80 (day / night).
I do not use IPTV.
The settings took about 10-15 minutes. I entered the login passwords, skimmed the MAC, and it all worked right away. The interface is in Russian in full, for each item the decoding is detailed for beginners. All on a green background, for the eyes nice. Feature: setting through IE will be most correct (this is true), this is the browser that the manufacturer recommends.
The speed does not cut through the air. Everything is by tariff (of course, in the line of sight of the router, i.e. in the same room with it, after 2 walls, the speed will naturally be lower - physics is physics).
The antenna power is average - the signal throughout the apartment is at least 2 strips out of 4. Standard is only N - there are simply no other adapters at home.
At the same time, 2 smartphones, 1 tablet and player are connected via wi-fi - no one feels discomfort. The router is slightly warm. Torrents do not indulge.
Conclusion - as a working horse for ordinary needs such as online video and web surf is the most. In other conditions, just did not check for no need.
Tretyakova Anastasia June 11, 2013, Yekaterinburg \ Experience: less than a month
Evaluation 5
Advantages: 1. Very inexpensive
2. Interface in Russian (after flashing)
3. Does not cut speed (even with a vpn connection, the speed easily reaches 85 megabits), comparing with DIR-615
4. Has a wifi signal strength setting
5. Allows you to quickly configure the issuance of specific IP-addresses with DHCP by mac-address
6. Has access to settings from the Internet
7. If necessary, allows you to control the channel width for each user.
8. Light bulbs are not halogen, at night they do not interfere with their flashing sleep (which is not to be said about DIR-615)
Disadvantages: 1. Cannot automatically check / install firmware updates
2. Does not have a system of "port forwarding" ... you can of course use "virtual servers" or the DMZ, but this does not give the desired effect (you can specify a range, but you cannot specify a set of ranges and individual ports separated by commas)
3. There is no built-in function for determining the correct MTU size, but due to the incorrect MTU value, which is issued by default, my provider has problems with all owners of such routers.
4. It is impossible (or very difficult) to determine whether the vpn connection is working (by DIR-615, if the vpn connection is lost, the orange light instead of the green light)
Comment: Very decent router for the price of 700 rubles. I don’t know if the old router was really losing packets somewhere, which is why the session was torn in online games, but at the same time there’s no such oddity about the router.
x4477 May 04, 2013, Novokuznetsk \ Experience: several months
Evaluation 5
Advantages: Great router! It is easily configured, there is all the functionality necessary for the home network. Firmware change is not required, and the standard can be updated in two clicks.There was no problem with the wireless network. Not a single glitch for all the time. When downloading torrents under ~ 10 MB / s, there are no problems.
Outwardly cute, perfectly fit into the design.
And it is inexpensive that the most important thing
Disadvantages: There are none.
Even strange: this is the first device to which I absolutely have no complaints.
Comment: Could take TL-WR842ND, but it costs more, and of the advantages only removable antennas and USB ports that I do not need. So it turned out to save.
maxxonent March 20, 2013 \ Experience: over a year
Evaluation 5
Advantages: Easy settings (2 minutes), stylish design, great price
Disadvantages: did not reveal
Comment: everything is simple and clear, good coverage of 80 sq. m. (standing in the back room), for 860 rubles - the best option. After the buggy Dir-300NRU, the whole family gets high, no need to reload every 3 hours
seryoshka74 February 03, 2013 \ Experience: less than a month
Evaluation 5
Advantages: IP-TV works fine on revision 8.1 device. Even HD channels via Wi-Fi are amazing.
Low price, nothing for such a productive router.
Disadvantages: The eternal glitch of many TP-Links because of the jamb with DNS - I recommend to specify the DNS DNS provider in your properties.
Comment: It is difficult to assess the reliability of the router in the long term. How many years will work.
Sobolev Semen December 11, 2012 \ Experience: several months
Evaluation 5
Advantages: Support WiFi N (up to 300M / b) Value for moneyQuick and easy setupFew warms upExistence of 4-port switch
Disadvantages: Not yet identified
Comment: I needed an access point to distribute the Internet from a dedicated line, that is, with a WAN port and preferably with WiFi N. First I thought to take some D-Link DAP-1160 (which by the way is only WiFi G), because before that I only used them ( again, due to price / quality), but then I came across reviews of TP-Link, in particular, the model under review. Before that, to be honest, I was skeptical of TP-Link, because I heard a lot of good reviews ("warm up, breaks", etc.), but this time I decided to try it, and the price for the offered functionality turned out to be very attractive. And I was not mistaken (for now). I was pleasantly surprised - the setup took about one and a half minutes. The only thing - downloaded a new firmware. The router is practically not heated, in comparison with the same D-link, while the WiFi power is set to High. So far very pleased. When choosing this model, the younger 741N stood next to it, with one antenna and another “old” square design. But I decided to take a new one, especially since the difference was about $ 10. In general, to summarize: if you need an inexpensive, functional WiFi N router, look at this model.
iam83 March 05, 2011 \ Experience: less than a month
TP-LINK TL-WR841N is selected in rating:
Top 10 Wi-Fi routers

Ratings

Selection

New technologies