Ratings Selection New technologies Reviews

Overview radar detector Crunch Q85 STR

Anti-radar Crunch Q85 STR - advantages, disadvantages, characteristics

Overview radar detector Crunch Q85 STR

Specifications

Receiver
K range 24050-224250 MHz
Ka Range 33400-336000 MHz
X range 10500-1050 MHz
Laser Detector there is, 800-1100 nm
Viewing angle of the laser detector 360°
Modes support Ultra-K, Ultra-X, POP, Instant-On
Signal receiver (radio channel) superheterodyne
Signal processing (radio channel) digital
Settings
City mode there is, the number of levels - 2
Track Mode there is
Disable individual ranges there is
Number of filters 1
Functions
Detection of radar type "Arrow" there is
Protection against detection VG-2
Settings Memory there is
Information output
Information display LED display
Brightness adjustment there is
Volume control there is
Mute there is
Housing
Mount on magnet
Dimensions 68x118x33mm
Weight 88 g
Additionally
Current consumption 80 mA
Energy saving there is
Working temperature -30 - 70 ° C
Additional Information determines the radar complex "Strelka" from a distance of at least 1 km; strobe buttons

Reviews of anti-radar Crunch Q85 STR

Virtues

  • -inexpensive
  • the arrow sees
  • interesting design

disadvantages

  • a lot of false on the arrow (just to the range of false is not a lot)
  • the distance to the arrow is too small
  • robot (multiradar) in the back is a disaster.
  • did not always work on trinogs (crises) in the back, only near or after the passage.

Comment
Went south, fly into the multiradar. maybe it is not bad in its price category. but I sold it and still bought a radar detector from a different price category (9-10 k). I will not call the brand, so as not considered advertising. after a trip to the south with a new detector there are no fines, although it exceeded stronger
Kuznetsov Alexander, 2013-11-28 Evaluation 3


 

Virtues

  • I got this radar in February of this year, I traveled mainly around the city and its suburbs. Shows all the camera shooter, fines during this time was not. I went to the dacha in Dubna on Dmitrovka, the radar showed two ambushes, stood on one camera on a tripod, caught it for 1.5 km, the second time there was a DPS car inside which a camera stood on the panel, caught it for 1 km.

disadvantages

  • Sometimes it scribbles at gas stations, but not for long and with a weak signal.

Comment
Everyone is happy, the anti-radar has long paid for itself.
Pavlovna Anastasia, 2014-04-28 Evaluation 5


 

Virtues

  • Design

disadvantages

  • Radar beating in the back; arrows sees unstable; mount only on the torpedo; false positives; frequent disconnection

Comment
The very idea of ​​the model is very interesting and even worth a little praise. Unfortunately, after the appearance in the model there is almost nothing good left.

1. Radar (including arrows), beating in the back detects for about 50-100 meters and the signal is often seen as intermittent.

2. The arrows directed to the face in most cases see, but often it happens, it consistently sees 300 meters, and the first scrapping for 600 meters. Again, in this case we are talking about the highway, direct visibility, good weather conditions. CRISS also catches badly.

3. False alarms have a place to be not only in the city, but also on the highway (gas stations, cafes, truckers on the highway, etc.).

4. The most interesting thing is that the fastening of the gadget itself is possible only on the torpedo, and at the same level. As you know, this is not always meet even in the freshest car.

5. It is still unclear why the radar itself is turned off.

It also happens that the display freezes. And in general, it is not clear why the manufacturer has ceased to engage in quality control and equipment control - from time to time something is missing.

By the way, some who are most flattering about this model here themselves sell this model of anti-radar.
sdsound.ru, 2014-04-17 Evaluation 2


 

Virtues

  • - Sees all the radars (for the arrow I will not say - we do not have it)
  • - there are few false triggers (automatic doors? Tuareg, new Mazda, etc.)
  • - convenient mount (but only on a torpedo)
  • - small haparites

disadvantages

  • detection range - sadness, expected better

Comment
I compare it with the old cranch 214 ..... he took the KRIS-S from a distance of 3 times further, though he did not see the Cordons, etc.
Vinney83, 2014-11-19 Evaluation 3


 

Virtues

  • It catches everything that is stated, i.e. all existing ranges! convenient fastening on a magnet - easy to remove-install (if you remove it in parking so that it is not stolen). Price.

disadvantages

  • probably, not

Comment
I scored in Yandex to catch all the ranges (including the arrow, ultra -..., POP, instant, etc.) among the analogues only the younger models of crunch and two stingera. I thought to buy Q65str, but because Q85str turned out to be even slightly cheaper, then bought it. It catches all declared ranges. You can turn off unnecessary at your own risk, and reduce sensitivity (two City modes past the standard Highway). Also, for especially irritable wheel, the volume reduction wheel is also present))). There is also a brightness adjustment (so as not to be annoyed at night and it was visible during the day). Quite pleased! The main thing to understand is that a radar detector is a device that reports when waves of a certain frequency pass through it, and not some kind of mythical device that makes your car invisible to traffic police officers))). Those who write that one catches the arrow for 800m, and the other for 2500m - I will answer that the device does not determine the distance to the radar, but captures the waves !!! and if you are passing through the zone where they are, the radar detector will tell you! There was a case when Q85 squeaked about the arrow for 3.35 km (I started beeping when I was at the traffic light in Old Kupavna reacting to the Radar in New Kupavna), because the radar was in direct visibility, while the car traveling in front of me periodically blocked this direct visibility and Q85 fell silent at these moments, and again signaled when the car drove off to the side ... but it was when only 500m (as soon as it entered the hill Moscow Ring Road, because this is the height and hid the ARROW from the straightness of the arrow) ... At first I was skeptical of the magnet, but then, on the contrary, I realized that it could not be better, because I always tidy it up in the glove compartment (so as not to steal the glass and in addition it was not smashed). I am not particularly worried about the appearance - it could have been more serious (although I didn’t see radar detectors with a special aesthetic look) - if you have children, they will like it))) I don’t understand those who write about weak stroboscopes as a disadvantage - I don’t not needed ... In general, I advise you to buy this unit Q85str.
Anonim 2013-08-07 Evaluation 5


 

Virtues

disadvantages

Comment
I have been using this anti-radar since October 2013, traveled with him to St. Petersburg and Rostov-on-Don, for the whole time not a single letter of happiness and a stop for speeding. Crunch Q85 STR is the perfect combination of price and quality.
Suslov Andrey, 2014-06-25 Evaluation 5

Video review radar detector Crunch Q85 STR

(test)

 

Author: Andrey Balyshev 02.06.2015
Attention! The accuracy of the information and the results of the ranking is subjective and is not an advertisement.

Ratings

Selection

New technologies